Rwanda deportations could be low if other deals done, says James Cleverly
BBC NewsFeb 04
UK Parliament Report: Rwanda Bill Incompatible With Human Rights
Image copyright: Dan Kitwood/Getty Images News via Getty Images
The Facts
A cross-party parliamentary committee report has claimed that the UK government's Rwanda bill is fundamentally incompatible with the UK's human rights obligations. The legislation is due to be debated in the House of Lords — the upper chamber of Parliament — on Monday.
In its report, Parliament's Joint Committee on Human Rights found that the bill "risks untold damage" to the UK's international human rights reputation. The Government’s Rwanda policy is part of the UK government's plan to address the rising number of migrants coming across the English Channel to the UK.
The Spin
Establishment-critical narrative
The report is the latest blow to the Sunak government and its unethical plan to send asylum seekers to Rwanda. It's shameful for the government of a country like the UK, which prides itself on defending human rights worldwide, to exploit the migration debate for political benefit. For a wealthy country like the UK to outsource its responsibility towards migrants to unsafe third countries is contrary to the principle of refugee protection, and does not solve any of the underlying problems of migration. This cynical and unlawful bill needs to be stopped.
Pro-establishment narrative
The report's conclusions do not do justice to the British government's efforts to solve the migration problem in compliance with its international obligations. For example, following the High Court ruling, the Government negotiated a new treaty with Kigali providing that relocated migrants cannot be sent from Rwanda to a country where they face persecution. The Rwanda scheme reflects the will of the British people and the bill will ensure that the Sunak government can live up to its responsibility to protect the UK's national security.